Enterprise Application Development 101
What is an Enterprise Application?β
An enterprise application is a large-scale software system designed to operate in corporate environments, serving the complex needs of organizations rather than individual consumers. These applications are mission-critical systems that power core business operations.
Common Examplesβ
E-Commerce Platforms
- Amazon, Shopify, eBay
- Handle millions of transactions daily
- Manage inventory, payments, shipping, customer data
- Require 24/7 availability
Banking Systems
- Online banking, mobile banking apps
- Process financial transactions with strict accuracy
- Must comply with regulations (PCI-DSS, SOX)
- Handle sensitive customer data
Healthcare Systems
- Electronic Health Records (EHR)
- Patient management systems
- Comply with HIPAA regulations
- Integrate with insurance, labs, pharmacies
SaaS Platforms
- Salesforce, Microsoft 365, Slack
- Multi-tenant architecture (one system, many customers)
- Subscription billing, user management
- High reliability expectations
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
- SAP, Oracle, NetSuite
- Manage company-wide operations (HR, finance, supply chain)
- Integration with multiple departments
- Long-term data retention requirements
Why Enterprise Apps Are Differentβ
Enterprise applications operate at a fundamentally different scale and with different constraints than personal projects or small applications.
Comparison: Simple App vs Enterprise Appβ
| Aspect | Simple App | Enterprise App |
|---|---|---|
| Users | Tens to hundreds | Thousands to millions |
| Data Volume | MBs to GBs | TBs to PBs |
| Uptime Requirement | 95-98% (some downtime acceptable) | 99.9%+ (43 minutes max downtime/month) |
| Security | Basic authentication | Multi-layer security, compliance (HIPAA, SOC 2) |
| Team Size | 1-5 developers | 10-100+ developers across multiple teams |
| Lifespan | 1-2 years | 5-10+ years (decades for some systems) |
| Cost of Failure | Minor inconvenience | Revenue loss, legal liability, reputational damage |
| Testing | Manual testing, basic unit tests | Automated test suites, 80%+ coverage |
| Deployment | Manual deploy, single server | CI/CD pipelines, multiple environments (dev/staging/prod) |
| Documentation | README, inline comments | Comprehensive docs, architecture diagrams, ADRs |
| Monitoring | Basic error logs | Centralized logging, metrics dashboards, alerting |
Key Characteristicsβ
Scale
- Must handle peak loads (Black Friday, tax season)
- Database queries optimized for millions of records
- Infrastructure auto-scales based on demand
Reliability
- Redundancy (multiple servers, databases)
- Failover mechanisms (automatic recovery)
- Disaster recovery plans (backup data centers)
Security
- Defense in depth (multiple security layers)
- Regular security audits and penetration testing
- Compliance certifications required
Maintainability
- Code must be readable by new team members
- Architecture decisions documented (ADRs)
- Modular design enables safe changes
Integration
- Connect with third-party services (payment gateways, email providers)
- Internal system integrations (CRM, ERP, analytics)
- API-first design for extensibility
Typical Enterprise Application Architectureβ
The 3-Tier Architectureβ
The foundation of most enterprise applications is the 3-tier architecture, which separates concerns into three distinct layers:
Presentation Layer
- User interfaces (web, mobile, desktop)
- Renders data from API
- Handles user interactions
- Stateless (no business logic)
Business Logic Layer
- Core application logic
- Business rules enforcement
- Data validation
- API endpoints
Data Layer
- Persistent storage (databases)
- Caching for performance
- Message queues for async tasks
- File/blob storage
Benefits
- Clear separation of concerns
- Each layer can scale independently
- Easy to swap implementations (e.g., change database)
- Parallel development (frontend/backend teams)
Modern Microservices Architectureβ
As applications grow, the monolithic business logic layer often splits into microservicesβsmall, independent services that each handle a specific business capability.
Key Principles
Single Responsibility
- Each service does ONE thing well
- User service handles authentication, not payments
- Clear boundaries reduce complexity
Independent Deployment
- Update payment service without restarting user service
- Faster release cycles
- Reduced risk (isolated failures)
Technology Diversity
- User service in Node.js, payment service in Java
- Choose best tool for each job
- Gradual technology migration
Decentralized Data
- Each service owns its database
- No shared database (prevents coupling)
- Data consistency via events
The Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC)β
Enterprise applications follow a structured development process to manage complexity and ensure quality.
Phase 1: Planning & Requirementsβ
Goal: Understand WHAT to build and WHY
Activities
- Stakeholder interviews (business teams, customers)
- Market research and competitive analysis
- Defining success metrics (KPIs)
- Prioritizing features (MoSCoW method)
Key Artifacts
- Product Requirements Document (PRD): Business objectives, target users, success criteria
- User Stories: "As a [user], I want [feature] so that [benefit]"
- Acceptance Criteria: Measurable conditions for done
Example User Story
As an e-commerce customer,
I want to save items to a wishlist,
So that I can purchase them later without searching again.
Acceptance Criteria:
- AC-001: User can add items to wishlist from product page
- AC-002: Wishlist persists across sessions (logged-in users)
- AC-003: User can remove items from wishlist
- AC-004: User receives email if wishlist item goes on sale
SpecWeave Integration
/specweave:increment "Add wishlist feature"createsspec.md- PM agent generates user stories with AC-IDs
- Traceability from requirements to tests
Phase 2: Design & Architectureβ
Goal: Decide HOW to build it (technical approach)
Activities
- High-Level Design (HLD): System architecture, component interactions
- Low-Level Design (LLD): Class diagrams, API contracts, database schema
- Technology stack selection (languages, frameworks, databases)
- Architecture Decision Records (ADRs): Document WHY we chose X over Y
Key Artifacts
- Architecture Diagrams: C4 model (context, container, component, code)
- API Specifications: OpenAPI/Swagger docs
- Database Schema: ER diagrams, table definitions
- ADRs: Decision rationale (e.g., "Why PostgreSQL over MongoDB")
Example ADR
ADR-005: Use PostgreSQL for Order Database
Context: Need reliable transactional database for order management
Decision: PostgreSQL
Rationale:
- ACID compliance (critical for financial data)
- Mature tooling (pg_dump, replication)
- JSON support (flexible schema for metadata)
- Team expertise (faster development)
Alternatives Considered:
- MongoDB: No transactions, eventual consistency risk
- MySQL: Weaker JSON support
Status: Accepted
SpecWeave Integration
- Architect agent creates
plan.mdwith HLD/LLD - ADRs stored in
.specweave/docs/internal/architecture/adr/ - Diagrams auto-generated with Mermaid
Phase 3: Implementationβ
Goal: Write the code that implements the design
Activities
- Setting up development environment
- Writing application code
- Writing unit tests (TDD: test-first approach)
- Code reviews (peer validation)
- Continuous integration (automated build/test)
Best Practices
- Small commits: Atomic changes, easy to review
- Branch strategy: Feature branches, PR-based workflow
- Code standards: Linting, formatting (ESLint, Prettier)
- Documentation: Inline comments for complex logic
Example: Feature Branch Workflow
# 1. Create feature branch from main
git checkout -b feature/wishlist-backend
# 2. Implement feature in small commits
git commit -m "feat: add Wishlist model"
git commit -m "feat: add POST /wishlist endpoint"
git commit -m "test: add unit tests for wishlist service"
# 3. Push and create Pull Request
git push origin feature/wishlist-backend
# 4. Code review β approval β merge to main
SpecWeave Integration
/specweave:doexecutes tasks fromtasks.md- Embedded test plans (BDD format)
- AC-ID traceability (spec β task β test)
Phase 4: Testingβ
Goal: Verify the system works correctly
Testing Levels
Unit Tests
- Test individual functions in isolation
- Fast (milliseconds)
- High coverage (80-90%)
- Example:
isValidEmail()function
Integration Tests
- Test service interactions
- Database, API endpoints
- Moderate speed (seconds)
- Example: POST /users endpoint saves to DB
End-to-End (E2E) Tests
- Test complete user workflows
- Browser automation (Playwright, Cypress)
- Slow (minutes)
- Example: User signup β login β add to cart β checkout
Non-Functional Tests
- Performance: Load testing (can handle 10K concurrent users?)
- Security: Penetration testing, vulnerability scans
- Accessibility: WCAG compliance (screen readers)
SpecWeave Integration
- Tests embedded in
tasks.md(v0.7.0+) - BDD format: Given/When/Then
- Coverage targets per task (80-90%)
/specweave:validate-coveragechecks completeness
Phase 5: Deploymentβ
Goal: Deliver code to production safely
Modern CI/CD Pipeline
Environments
- Development: Developer local machines
- Staging: Production-like environment for testing
- Production: Live system serving real users
Deployment Strategies
- Blue-Green: Two production environments, switch traffic instantly
- Canary: Roll out to 5% of users, then 50%, then 100%
- Rolling: Update servers one at a time (no downtime)
- Define infrastructure in code (Terraform, CloudFormation)
- Version control for infrastructure
- Reproducible deployments
SpecWeave Integration
- GitHub Actions integration
- Automated living docs sync post-deployment
- DORA metrics tracking (deployment frequency, lead time)
Phase 6: Operations & Monitoringβ
Goal: Keep the system running reliably
Observability Pillars
Logging
- Structured logs (JSON format)
- Centralized aggregation (ELK Stack, Splunk)
- Error tracking (Sentry, Rollbar)
Metrics
- Application metrics (request rate, latency, error rate)
- Infrastructure metrics (CPU, memory, disk)
- Business metrics (revenue, conversions)
- Dashboards (Grafana, Datadog)
Alerting
- On-call rotation (PagerDuty, Opsgenie)
- SLA/SLO tracking (99.9% uptime)
- Incident response runbooks
Example Alert
Alert: API Error Rate > 5%
Current: 12% (120 errors/min)
Impact: Users cannot checkout
Runbook: https://docs.company.com/runbooks/api-errors
Assigned: On-Call Engineer
SpecWeave Integration
- Living docs stay current (post-task completion hook)
- Incident documentation (ADRs for root cause)
- Operational runbooks in
.specweave/docs/internal/operations/
Roles in Enterprise Developmentβ
Enterprise applications require diverse expertise across multiple roles:
| Role | Responsibilities | Skills | SpecWeave Agent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product Manager (PM) | Define requirements, prioritize features, stakeholder communication | Business analysis, user research, roadmap planning | PM Agent (spec) |
| Software Architect | Design system architecture, technology decisions, ADRs | System design, scalability, trade-off analysis | Architect Agent (plan) |
| Backend Developer | Implement APIs, business logic, database design | Java, Python, Node.js, SQL, API design | Tech Lead Agent (tasks) |
| Frontend Developer | Build user interfaces, client-side logic | React, Angular, Vue, TypeScript, CSS | Frontend Agent (plugin) |
| DevOps Engineer | CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure, deployment automation | Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, AWS/Azure | DevOps Agent (plugin) |
| QA Engineer | Test planning, automation, quality assurance | Selenium, Playwright, test frameworks | QA Agent (plugin) |
| Security Engineer | Security audits, compliance, threat modeling | OWASP, penetration testing, cryptography | Security Agent (plugin) |
| Data Engineer | Data pipelines, ETL, analytics infrastructure | Spark, Airflow, SQL, data modeling | Data Agent (plugin) |
| SRE (Site Reliability Engineer) | Production reliability, incident response, monitoring | Linux, networking, distributed systems | SRE Agent (plugin) |
SpecWeave Connection
- Core agents (PM, Architect, Tech Lead) mirror real-world roles
- Plugin agents extend to specialized domains (ML, payments, infrastructure)
- Agents produce artifacts in standard formats (spec.md, plan.md, tasks)
Common Enterprise Patternsβ
1. API-First Developmentβ
Concept: Design the API contract BEFORE implementing frontend or backend.
Benefits
- Parallel development (frontend/backend teams)
- Clear contract prevents integration issues
- API documentation auto-generated
Example OpenAPI Spec
openapi: 3.0.0
paths:
/wishlist:
post:
summary: Add item to wishlist
requestBody:
content:
application/json:
schema:
type: object
properties:
productId:
type: string
responses:
201:
description: Item added
400:
description: Invalid product ID
2. Database-Per-Service (Microservices)β
Concept: Each microservice owns its database, no shared database.
Benefits
- Services can evolve independently
- Technology diversity (Postgres, MongoDB, Redis)
- Fault isolation (payment DB down doesn't break user service)
Trade-offs
- No SQL joins across services
- Data consistency challenges (eventual consistency)
- Distributed transactions complexity
3. Event-Driven Architectureβ
Concept: Services communicate via events instead of direct API calls.
Benefits
- Loose coupling (services don't know about each other)
- Resilience (if inventory service is down, event waits in queue)
- Scalability (add more consumers for popular events)
Use Cases
- Order processing pipelines
- Real-time notifications
- Data synchronization
- Audit logging
4. Circuit Breaker Patternβ
Concept: Prevent cascading failures when a service is down.
Benefits
- Fast failure (don't wait for timeout)
- Service recovery time (stops overwhelming broken service)
- Graceful degradation (show cached data instead of error)
5. CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation)β
Concept: Separate read and write operations into different models.
Benefits
- Optimized databases for each use case (write DB normalized, read DB denormalized)
- Independent scaling (read-heavy apps scale read replicas)
- Complex queries don't affect write performance
Use Cases
- E-commerce product catalogs (millions of reads, few writes)
- Analytics dashboards (complex queries)
- Audit systems (append-only writes, complex reporting)
Documentation Strategyβ
Why Documentation Mattersβ
Knowledge Sharing
- New developers onboard faster (30 days β 7 days with good docs)
- Team alignment (everyone understands the "why")
- Reduce bus factor (no single point of failure)
Future Maintenance
- "Why did we choose Redis?" β ADR explains the reasoning
- "How does authentication work?" β Architecture diagram shows flow
- 6 months later: "What did this code do?" β Inline comments help
Compliance Requirements
- FDA (medical devices): Traceability from requirements to code
- SOC 2 (security): Document access controls, incident response
- HIPAA (healthcare): Audit trails for data access
Incident Response
- Runbooks guide on-call engineers
- Architecture diagrams help diagnose issues
- Historical decisions (ADRs) provide context
Documentation Hierarchyβ
SpecWeave's Living Documentation
Traditional problem: Docs become stale
Week 1: Write docs
Week 2: Update code, forget to update docs
Month 1: Docs are 50% wrong
Year 1: Docs are 90% wrong, no one trusts them
SpecWeave solution: Auto-sync after every task
Task completes β post-task-completion hook fires β living docs sync
- ADRs updated (Proposed β Accepted)
- Architecture diagrams regenerated
- API docs refreshed
- Always current, always trusted
Real-World Example: E-Commerce Platformβ
Let's build a complete e-commerce platform to see how enterprise concepts come together.
System Architectureβ
User Checkout Flow (Detailed)β
Service Responsibilitiesβ
User Service
- Authentication (JWT tokens, OAuth2)
- User profiles (name, email, preferences)
- Address management (shipping, billing)
- Password reset, email verification
Product Service
- Product catalog (100K+ products)
- Search (Elasticsearch for fast full-text search)
- Reviews and ratings
- Image storage (S3)
Cart Service
- Shopping cart (Redis for fast access)
- Wishlist
- Cart expiration (7 days)
- Session-based carts (guest users)
Order Service
- Order creation, status tracking
- Order history
- Cancellation, returns
- Integration with shipping service
Payment Service
- Stripe, PayPal integration
- PCI-DSS compliance (never store card numbers)
- Refund processing
- Transaction history
Inventory Service
- Stock levels (real-time)
- Warehouse management
- Restock alerts
- Stock reservation (during checkout)
Notification Service
- Email (SendGrid, Mailgun)
- SMS (Twilio)
- Push notifications (Firebase)
- Templates (order confirmation, shipping updates)
Shipping Service
- Carrier integration (FedEx, UPS, USPS)
- Tracking number generation
- Shipping cost calculation
- Delivery time estimates
Data Models (Simplified)β
User Service
CREATE TABLE users (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
email VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
password_hash VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
first_name VARCHAR(100),
last_name VARCHAR(100),
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
);
CREATE TABLE addresses (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
user_id UUID REFERENCES users(id),
street VARCHAR(255),
city VARCHAR(100),
state VARCHAR(50),
zip_code VARCHAR(20),
country VARCHAR(50),
is_default BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE
);
Order Service
CREATE TABLE orders (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
user_id UUID NOT NULL,
status VARCHAR(50), -- PENDING, PAID, SHIPPED, DELIVERED, CANCELLED
total_amount DECIMAL(10,2),
shipping_address_id UUID,
payment_method VARCHAR(50),
payment_transaction_id VARCHAR(255),
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
);
CREATE TABLE order_items (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
order_id UUID REFERENCES orders(id),
product_id UUID,
quantity INT,
unit_price DECIMAL(10,2),
subtotal DECIMAL(10,2)
);
API Endpoints (Sample)β
# User Service
POST /auth/signup
POST /auth/login
POST /auth/logout
GET /users/:id
PUT /users/:id
GET /users/:id/addresses
POST /users/:id/addresses
# Product Service
GET /products
GET /products/:id
POST /products (admin only)
GET /products/search?q=laptop
POST /products/:id/reviews
# Cart Service
GET /cart
POST /cart/items
DELETE /cart/items/:id
POST /cart/clear
# Order Service
POST /orders
GET /orders/:id
GET /orders (user's order history)
PUT /orders/:id/cancel
# Payment Service
POST /payments (internal only, called by order service)
POST /refunds (admin only)
Development Workflow with SpecWeaveβ
Phase 1: Planning
# PM creates increment
/specweave:increment "Add wishlist feature"
# Generates spec.md with:
# - User stories (US-001: Save items to wishlist)
# - Acceptance criteria (AC-US1-01: User can add/remove items)
# - Success metrics (wishlist adoption rate > 30%)
Phase 2: Design
# Architect reviews spec, creates plan.md with:
# - HLD: Wishlist table in Cart Service
# - API design: POST /wishlist, GET /wishlist, DELETE /wishlist/:id
# - Database schema
# - ADR: Why Cart Service owns wishlist (not User Service)
Phase 3: Implementation
# Tech Lead generates tasks.md with embedded tests:
# - T-001: Create Wishlist table (unit tests, 90% coverage)
# - T-002: Add POST /wishlist endpoint (integration tests, 85% coverage)
# - T-003: Add GET /wishlist endpoint (E2E tests, critical path)
# - T-004: Update frontend (Playwright tests)
# - T-005: Documentation update
# Execute tasks
/specweave:do
# Claude Code implements T-001, T-002, etc.
# After each task: post-task-completion hook syncs living docs
Phase 4: Testing
# Validate test coverage
/specweave:validate-coverage
# Output:
# β
T-001: 92% coverage (target: 90%)
# β
T-002: 87% coverage (target: 85%)
# β
T-003: 100% E2E critical path
# β
T-004: Playwright tests passing
# β
Overall: 89% coverage (target: 85%)
Phase 5: Deployment
# CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions)
# - Build β Unit tests β Integration tests β Deploy to staging
# - E2E tests on staging β Manual approval β Deploy to production
# - Post-deployment: Living docs sync, DORA metrics update
Phase 6: Operations
# Monitoring dashboard shows:
# - Wishlist creation rate: 1,200/hour
# - API latency: P95 = 120ms (target: <200ms)
# - Error rate: 0.3% (target: <1%)
# Living docs automatically updated:
# - ADR-012: Wishlist in Cart Service (Proposed β Accepted)
# - API docs: POST /wishlist endpoint documented
# - Architecture diagram: Wishlist component added
How SpecWeave Supports Enterprise Developmentβ
1. Specification-First Workflowβ
Traditional Problem
Developer: "I'll just start coding, we can figure out requirements later"
Result: Scope creep, rework, missed requirements
SpecWeave Solution
PM Agent: Generate spec.md with:
- User stories (what the user wants)
- Acceptance criteria (measurable done conditions)
- Success metrics (how we measure impact)
Result: Clear direction, no ambiguity, testable outcomes
Benefits
- Single source of truth (spec)
- Traceability (requirement β code β test)
- Stakeholder alignment (everyone approves spec first)
2. Architecture Documentation (ADRs)β
Traditional Problem
6 months later: "Why did we choose MongoDB?"
Engineer: "I don't remember. The person who decided left the company."
Result: Fear of change, technical debt accumulates
SpecWeave Solution
Architect Agent: Generate ADR-005
- Context: Need database for product catalog
- Decision: Elasticsearch (not MongoDB)
- Rationale: Fast full-text search, faceted navigation
- Alternatives: MongoDB (slower search), PostgreSQL (no full-text)
- Status: Accepted
Result: Historical record, rationale preserved forever
Benefits
- Onboarding (new engineers understand past decisions)
- Change decisions (re-evaluate with full context)
- Compliance (audit trail for regulations)
3. Test Traceability (AC-IDs)β
Traditional Problem
QA: "This test is failing. What requirement does it test?"
Engineer: "I don't know. The test was written 2 years ago."
Result: Fear of deleting tests, bloated test suites
SpecWeave Solution
spec.md:
AC-US1-01: User can add items to wishlist
tasks.md:
T-002: Implement POST /wishlist endpoint
AC: AC-US1-01
Test Cases:
- Unit: addToWishlist(userId, productId) β wishlist updated
- Integration: POST /wishlist β 201 Created
- E2E: User clicks "Add to Wishlist" β item appears in wishlist page
Result: Clear traceability from requirement to test
Benefits
- Understand test purpose (AC-US1-01 explains why this test exists)
- Safe refactoring (if requirement changes, update linked tests)
- Coverage analysis (/specweave:validate-coverage shows AC-ID coverage)
4. Living Documentation (Auto-Sync)β
Traditional Problem
Week 1: Write docs (accurate)
Week 2: Update code, forget docs (docs 20% stale)
Month 1: Docs 50% wrong
Year 1: Docs 90% wrong, no one trusts them
SpecWeave Solution
post-task-completion.sh hook:
- Task T-002 completes
- Hook fires automatically
- Syncs living docs:
- ADR-012: Proposed β Accepted
- API docs: POST /wishlist endpoint added
- Architecture diagram: Wishlist component added
- CHANGELOG.md: Updated with new feature
Result: Docs always current, always trusted
Benefits
- Zero manual effort (automation)
- Always accurate (syncs after every task)
- Trusted source (team relies on docs)
5. Compliance Support (FDA, SOC 2, HIPAA)β
Regulatory Requirements
FDA (Medical Devices)
- Traceability: Requirement β Design β Code β Test
- Validation: Tests prove requirements are met
- Change control: Document all changes
SOC 2 (Security)
- Access controls: Who can deploy to production?
- Audit trails: When was code deployed? By whom?
- Incident response: Documented runbooks
HIPAA (Healthcare)
- Data handling: Encrypt PHI (Protected Health Information)
- Access logs: Who accessed patient data?
- Compliance documentation: Policies, procedures
SpecWeave Compliance Features
AC-IDs provide traceability:
SPEC-0005 (User Authentication)
βββ AC-US1-01: User can log in
β βββ T-001: Implement AuthService
β β βββ Test: validLogin() passes
β βββ T-003: Implement POST /auth/login
β βββ Test: E2E login flow passes
βββ AC-US1-02: Failed login attempts are logged
βββ T-004: Implement audit logging
βββ Test: Failed login creates audit log entry
Audit trail:
2025-11-04 10:30 - PM Agent creates spec.md
2025-11-04 11:15 - Architect Agent creates plan.md
2025-11-04 14:20 - T-001 completed (commit abc123)
2025-11-04 16:45 - T-003 completed (commit def456)
2025-11-05 09:10 - Deployed to production (v1.2.0)
ADRs document decisions:
ADR-007: Why We Chose JWT for Authentication
- Regulatory context: HIPAA requires secure authentication
- Decision: JWT tokens (not session cookies)
- Rationale: Stateless, scalable, audit trail in token
Best Practices for Enterprise Developmentβ
1. Start Small, Iterate Oftenβ
Don't: Build the entire system before deploying
6 months development β Deploy β Realize requirements changed
Do: Ship incremental value
Week 1: Basic authentication β Deploy
Week 2: User profiles β Deploy
Week 3: Password reset β Deploy
SpecWeave Support: Increments naturally enforce small batches
2. Write Tests First (TDD)β
Don't: Write code, then write tests as an afterthought
Code works β Tests pass (but are they testing the right thing?)
Do: Write tests first
Red (failing test) β Green (minimal code) β Refactor (improve code)
SpecWeave Support: test_mode: TDD in tasks.md, embedded test plans
3. Document Decisions (ADRs)β
Don't: Make decisions in Slack/email, no record
6 months later: "Why did we choose X?"
Answer: "No one remembers"
Do: Write Architecture Decision Records
ADR-008: Why We Chose Polling Over WebSockets
- Context: Need real-time order updates
- Decision: Long-polling (not WebSockets)
- Rationale: Simpler, works with load balancers, fewer browser issues
SpecWeave Support: ADRs auto-generated, stored in .specweave/docs/internal/architecture/adr/
4. Code Reviews Are Mandatoryβ
Don't: Merge code without review
Developer pushes to main β Production breaks
Do: Pull Request workflow
Feature branch β PR β Code review β Approval β Merge
Best Practices
- Small PRs (200-400 lines, easier to review)
- Clear description (what, why, testing done)
- Link to spec (AC-IDs)
5. Monitor Everythingβ
Don't: Deploy and hope it works
Production breaks β Users complain β You find out hours later
Do: Proactive monitoring
Error rate spike β Alert fires β On-call investigates β Fix deployed
Four Golden Signals (Google SRE)
- Latency: How long requests take
- Traffic: How many requests
- Errors: How many requests fail
- Saturation: How full the system is (CPU, memory)
6. Automate Repetitive Tasksβ
Don't: Manual processes (error-prone, slow)
Developer: "Can someone deploy to staging?"
DevOps: "I'm busy, maybe tomorrow"
Do: CI/CD automation
Push to main β Tests run β Deploy to staging (automatic)
Manual approval β Deploy to production (one-click)
7. Use Feature Flagsβ
Don't: Big bang releases (all-or-nothing)
Deploy new checkout flow β 20% of users can't checkout β Rollback
Do: Feature flags (gradual rollout)
Enable for 5% β Monitor β 50% β Monitor β 100%
Example
if (featureFlags.newCheckoutFlow) {
// New code
} else {
// Old code (fallback)
}
8. Practice Blameless Postmortemsβ
Don't: Blame individuals for incidents
"Who broke production?" β Fear, hiding mistakes
Do: Blameless postmortems (focus on systems)
"What systemic issue allowed this to happen?"
"How can we prevent this class of error?"
Example Postmortem
Incident: Database ran out of disk space
Root Cause: No disk usage monitoring
Fix: Add disk usage alerts (>80% β warning, >90% β critical)
Prevention: Automated disk cleanup scripts
Follow-up: Review all critical resources for monitoring gaps
9. Keep Services Small and Focusedβ
Don't: Monolithic microservices (1000+ endpoints in one service)
"User Service" that also handles orders, payments, shipping
Do: Single Responsibility Principle
User Service: Authentication, profiles
Order Service: Order management
Payment Service: Payment processing
Rule of thumb: If it takes >30 minutes to explain a service, it's too big
10. Invest in Developer Experienceβ
Don't: "Works on my machine" problems
New developer: "I spent 3 days setting up the environment"
Do: One-command setup
make dev-setup # Installs all dependencies, seeds database, starts services
SpecWeave Support: specweave init sets up project structure, .claude/ files, ready to go
Common Pitfalls to Avoidβ
1. Premature Optimizationβ
Mistake: Optimize before knowing if it's needed
Developer: "Let's cache everything! Add Redis! Use microservices!"
Result: Complexity without benefit (100 users don't need microservices)
Solution: Measure first, optimize later
Profile the code β Find bottleneck β Optimize that ONE thing
Rule: "Premature optimization is the root of all evil" - Donald Knuth
2. Skipping Testsβ
Mistake: "We'll add tests later" (spoiler: you won't)
No tests β Code breaks β Fear of change β Technical debt
Solution: Tests are non-negotiable
SpecWeave: tasks.md includes test plans (80-90% coverage)
CI/CD: Blocks merges if tests fail
3. Not Planning for Failureβ
Mistake: Assume everything works perfectly
Payment gateway goes down β Entire checkout flow breaks
Solution: Design for failure
Circuit breakers (fail fast)
Fallbacks (use cached data)
Graceful degradation (show error message, allow retry)
4. Poor Error Messagesβ
Mistake: Generic error messages
User sees: "Error 500: Internal Server Error"
Developer sees: Stack trace with no context
Solution: Actionable error messages
User sees: "Payment declined. Please check your card details or try another card."
Developer sees: "PaymentGatewayError: Stripe API returned 402 (insufficient_funds)"
Logs include: request ID, user ID, timestamp, stack trace
5. No Rollback Planβ
Mistake: Deploy without a way to undo
Deploy v2.0 β Production breaks β "How do we rollback?"
Solution: Always have a rollback plan
Blue-green deployment (instant rollback by switching traffic)
Database migrations (reversible with down() function)
Feature flags (disable feature without redeploying)
6. Ignoring Securityβ
Mistake: "We'll add security later"
Launch with no HTTPS β User passwords stolen β Lawsuit
Solution: Security from day one
HTTPS everywhere (TLS certificates)
Input validation (prevent SQL injection, XSS)
Authentication (JWT tokens, not session cookies)
Regular security audits (penetration testing)
7. Over-Engineeringβ
Mistake: Use complex architecture for simple problems
TODO list app with microservices, Kafka, Kubernetes
Solution: Choose the right tool for the job
Small app: Monolith (Rails, Django)
Medium app: Modular monolith (separate modules, one codebase)
Large app: Microservices (when team size >50 engineers)
Rule: Start simple, split when needed (not preemptively)
Next Steps: Continue Your Learningβ
Explore Related Guidesβ
Infrastructure & Operations
- Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Fundamentals
- Terraform, CloudFormation, Ansible
- Immutable infrastructure
- GitOps workflows
Backend Development
- Backend Development Guide
- REST APIs, GraphQL
- Database design (SQL vs NoSQL)
- Authentication patterns
Frontend Development
- Frontend Development Guide
- React, Angular, Vue
- State management (Redux, Zustand)
- Performance optimization
DevOps & CI/CD
- CI/CD Pipeline Design
- GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins
- Automated testing strategies
- Deployment strategies
Testing Strategies
- Testing Pyramid in Practice
- Unit, integration, E2E tests
- TDD and BDD workflows
- Test coverage strategies
Glossary Termsβ
Deepen your understanding of key concepts:
- API (Application Programming Interface)
- Microservices Architecture
- CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment)
- Infrastructure as Code (IaC)
- Docker & Containerization
- Kubernetes (K8s)
- Database (Relational vs NoSQL)
- Authentication & Authorization
SpecWeave in Actionβ
Try SpecWeave for Your Next Project
-
Install SpecWeave
npm install -g specweave
specweave init -
Create Your First Increment
/specweave:increment "Add user authentication" -
Follow the Workflow
- PM agent generates
spec.md(user stories, AC) - Architect agent creates
plan.md(HLD, LLD, ADRs) - Tech Lead generates
tasks.md(embedded tests) /specweave:doexecutes tasks- Living docs sync automatically
- PM agent generates
-
Join the Community
Additional Resourcesβ
Books
- Designing Data-Intensive Applications by Martin Kleppmann
- The Phoenix Project by Gene Kim (DevOps)
- Clean Architecture by Robert C. Martin
- Site Reliability Engineering by Google
Courses
Blogs & Newsletters
- Engineering blogs (Uber, Netflix, Spotify)
- High Scalability
- Martin Fowler's Blog
Summaryβ
Enterprise application development is fundamentally different from building personal projects. It requires:
Planning & Discipline
- Specification-first workflows (clear requirements)
- Architecture decisions documented (ADRs)
- Test-driven development (80%+ coverage)
Scale & Reliability
- Microservices for independent scaling
- Database-per-service for fault isolation
- Event-driven architecture for resilience
- Circuit breakers for graceful degradation
Team Collaboration
- Clear roles (PM, Architect, Developers, DevOps)
- Living documentation (always current)
- Code reviews (peer validation)
- Blameless postmortems (learn from failures)
Automation & Monitoring
- CI/CD pipelines (automated testing and deployment)
- Observability (logging, metrics, alerting)
- Infrastructure as Code (reproducible deployments)
SpecWeave Advantage
- Specification-first (spec.md = single source of truth)
- Living documentation (auto-syncs after every task)
- Test traceability (AC-IDs link requirements to tests)
- Compliance support (FDA, SOC 2, HIPAA)
- Increment-based workflow (small batches, continuous delivery)
Next Steps: Start your next project with SpecWeave, follow the SDLC, and build enterprise-grade systems with confidence.
Document Version: 1.0 Last Updated: 2025-11-04 Feedback: Open an issue or join discussions