Skip to main content

Enterprise Application Development 101

What is an Enterprise Application?​

An enterprise application is a large-scale software system designed to operate in corporate environments, serving the complex needs of organizations rather than individual consumers. These applications are mission-critical systems that power core business operations.

Common Examples​

E-Commerce Platforms

  • Amazon, Shopify, eBay
  • Handle millions of transactions daily
  • Manage inventory, payments, shipping, customer data
  • Require 24/7 availability

Banking Systems

  • Online banking, mobile banking apps
  • Process financial transactions with strict accuracy
  • Must comply with regulations (PCI-DSS, SOX)
  • Handle sensitive customer data

Healthcare Systems

  • Electronic Health Records (EHR)
  • Patient management systems
  • Comply with HIPAA regulations
  • Integrate with insurance, labs, pharmacies

SaaS Platforms

  • Salesforce, Microsoft 365, Slack
  • Multi-tenant architecture (one system, many customers)
  • Subscription billing, user management
  • High reliability expectations

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

  • SAP, Oracle, NetSuite
  • Manage company-wide operations (HR, finance, supply chain)
  • Integration with multiple departments
  • Long-term data retention requirements

Why Enterprise Apps Are Different​

Enterprise applications operate at a fundamentally different scale and with different constraints than personal projects or small applications.

Comparison: Simple App vs Enterprise App​

AspectSimple AppEnterprise App
UsersTens to hundredsThousands to millions
Data VolumeMBs to GBsTBs to PBs
Uptime Requirement95-98% (some downtime acceptable)99.9%+ (43 minutes max downtime/month)
SecurityBasic authenticationMulti-layer security, compliance (HIPAA, SOC 2)
Team Size1-5 developers10-100+ developers across multiple teams
Lifespan1-2 years5-10+ years (decades for some systems)
Cost of FailureMinor inconvenienceRevenue loss, legal liability, reputational damage
TestingManual testing, basic unit testsAutomated test suites, 80%+ coverage
DeploymentManual deploy, single serverCI/CD pipelines, multiple environments (dev/staging/prod)
DocumentationREADME, inline commentsComprehensive docs, architecture diagrams, ADRs
MonitoringBasic error logsCentralized logging, metrics dashboards, alerting

Key Characteristics​

Scale

  • Must handle peak loads (Black Friday, tax season)
  • Database queries optimized for millions of records
  • Infrastructure auto-scales based on demand

Reliability

  • Redundancy (multiple servers, databases)
  • Failover mechanisms (automatic recovery)
  • Disaster recovery plans (backup data centers)

Security

  • Defense in depth (multiple security layers)
  • Regular security audits and penetration testing
  • Compliance certifications required

Maintainability

  • Code must be readable by new team members
  • Architecture decisions documented (ADRs)
  • Modular design enables safe changes

Integration

  • Connect with third-party services (payment gateways, email providers)
  • Internal system integrations (CRM, ERP, analytics)
  • API-first design for extensibility

Typical Enterprise Application Architecture​

The 3-Tier Architecture​

The foundation of most enterprise applications is the 3-tier architecture, which separates concerns into three distinct layers:

Presentation Layer

  • User interfaces (web, mobile, desktop)
  • Renders data from API
  • Handles user interactions
  • Stateless (no business logic)

Business Logic Layer

  • Core application logic
  • Business rules enforcement
  • Data validation
  • API endpoints

Data Layer

  • Persistent storage (databases)
  • Caching for performance
  • Message queues for async tasks
  • File/blob storage

Benefits

  • Clear separation of concerns
  • Each layer can scale independently
  • Easy to swap implementations (e.g., change database)
  • Parallel development (frontend/backend teams)

Modern Microservices Architecture​

As applications grow, the monolithic business logic layer often splits into microservicesβ€”small, independent services that each handle a specific business capability.

Key Principles

Single Responsibility

  • Each service does ONE thing well
  • User service handles authentication, not payments
  • Clear boundaries reduce complexity

Independent Deployment

  • Update payment service without restarting user service
  • Faster release cycles
  • Reduced risk (isolated failures)

Technology Diversity

  • User service in Node.js, payment service in Java
  • Choose best tool for each job
  • Gradual technology migration

Decentralized Data

  • Each service owns its database
  • No shared database (prevents coupling)
  • Data consistency via events

The Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC)​

Enterprise applications follow a structured development process to manage complexity and ensure quality.

Phase 1: Planning & Requirements​

Goal: Understand WHAT to build and WHY

Activities

  • Stakeholder interviews (business teams, customers)
  • Market research and competitive analysis
  • Defining success metrics (KPIs)
  • Prioritizing features (MoSCoW method)

Key Artifacts

  • Product Requirements Document (PRD): Business objectives, target users, success criteria
  • User Stories: "As a [user], I want [feature] so that [benefit]"
  • Acceptance Criteria: Measurable conditions for done

Example User Story

As an e-commerce customer,
I want to save items to a wishlist,
So that I can purchase them later without searching again.

Acceptance Criteria:
- AC-001: User can add items to wishlist from product page
- AC-002: Wishlist persists across sessions (logged-in users)
- AC-003: User can remove items from wishlist
- AC-004: User receives email if wishlist item goes on sale

SpecWeave Integration

  • /specweave:increment "Add wishlist feature" creates spec.md
  • PM agent generates user stories with AC-IDs
  • Traceability from requirements to tests

Phase 2: Design & Architecture​

Goal: Decide HOW to build it (technical approach)

Activities

  • High-Level Design (HLD): System architecture, component interactions
  • Low-Level Design (LLD): Class diagrams, API contracts, database schema
  • Technology stack selection (languages, frameworks, databases)
  • Architecture Decision Records (ADRs): Document WHY we chose X over Y

Key Artifacts

  • Architecture Diagrams: C4 model (context, container, component, code)
  • API Specifications: OpenAPI/Swagger docs
  • Database Schema: ER diagrams, table definitions
  • ADRs: Decision rationale (e.g., "Why PostgreSQL over MongoDB")

Example ADR

ADR-005: Use PostgreSQL for Order Database

Context: Need reliable transactional database for order management

Decision: PostgreSQL

Rationale:
- ACID compliance (critical for financial data)
- Mature tooling (pg_dump, replication)
- JSON support (flexible schema for metadata)
- Team expertise (faster development)

Alternatives Considered:
- MongoDB: No transactions, eventual consistency risk
- MySQL: Weaker JSON support

Status: Accepted

SpecWeave Integration

  • Architect agent creates plan.md with HLD/LLD
  • ADRs stored in .specweave/docs/internal/architecture/adr/
  • Diagrams auto-generated with Mermaid

Phase 3: Implementation​

Goal: Write the code that implements the design

Activities

  • Setting up development environment
  • Writing application code
  • Writing unit tests (TDD: test-first approach)
  • Code reviews (peer validation)
  • Continuous integration (automated build/test)

Best Practices

  • Small commits: Atomic changes, easy to review
  • Branch strategy: Feature branches, PR-based workflow
  • Code standards: Linting, formatting (ESLint, Prettier)
  • Documentation: Inline comments for complex logic

Example: Feature Branch Workflow

# 1. Create feature branch from main
git checkout -b feature/wishlist-backend

# 2. Implement feature in small commits
git commit -m "feat: add Wishlist model"
git commit -m "feat: add POST /wishlist endpoint"
git commit -m "test: add unit tests for wishlist service"

# 3. Push and create Pull Request
git push origin feature/wishlist-backend

# 4. Code review β†’ approval β†’ merge to main

SpecWeave Integration

  • /specweave:do executes tasks from tasks.md
  • Embedded test plans (BDD format)
  • AC-ID traceability (spec β†’ task β†’ test)

Phase 4: Testing​

Goal: Verify the system works correctly

Testing Levels

Unit Tests

  • Test individual functions in isolation
  • Fast (milliseconds)
  • High coverage (80-90%)
  • Example: isValidEmail() function

Integration Tests

  • Test service interactions
  • Database, API endpoints
  • Moderate speed (seconds)
  • Example: POST /users endpoint saves to DB

End-to-End (E2E) Tests

  • Test complete user workflows
  • Browser automation (Playwright, Cypress)
  • Slow (minutes)
  • Example: User signup β†’ login β†’ add to cart β†’ checkout

Non-Functional Tests

  • Performance: Load testing (can handle 10K concurrent users?)
  • Security: Penetration testing, vulnerability scans
  • Accessibility: WCAG compliance (screen readers)

SpecWeave Integration

  • Tests embedded in tasks.md (v0.7.0+)
  • BDD format: Given/When/Then
  • Coverage targets per task (80-90%)
  • /specweave:validate-coverage checks completeness

Phase 5: Deployment​

Goal: Deliver code to production safely

Modern CI/CD Pipeline

Environments

  • Development: Developer local machines
  • Staging: Production-like environment for testing
  • Production: Live system serving real users

Deployment Strategies

  • Blue-Green: Two production environments, switch traffic instantly
  • Canary: Roll out to 5% of users, then 50%, then 100%
  • Rolling: Update servers one at a time (no downtime)

Infrastructure as Code (IaC)

  • Define infrastructure in code (Terraform, CloudFormation)
  • Version control for infrastructure
  • Reproducible deployments

SpecWeave Integration

  • GitHub Actions integration
  • Automated living docs sync post-deployment
  • DORA metrics tracking (deployment frequency, lead time)

Phase 6: Operations & Monitoring​

Goal: Keep the system running reliably

Observability Pillars

Logging

  • Structured logs (JSON format)
  • Centralized aggregation (ELK Stack, Splunk)
  • Error tracking (Sentry, Rollbar)

Metrics

  • Application metrics (request rate, latency, error rate)
  • Infrastructure metrics (CPU, memory, disk)
  • Business metrics (revenue, conversions)
  • Dashboards (Grafana, Datadog)

Alerting

  • On-call rotation (PagerDuty, Opsgenie)
  • SLA/SLO tracking (99.9% uptime)
  • Incident response runbooks

Example Alert

Alert: API Error Rate > 5%
Current: 12% (120 errors/min)
Impact: Users cannot checkout
Runbook: https://docs.company.com/runbooks/api-errors
Assigned: On-Call Engineer

SpecWeave Integration

  • Living docs stay current (post-task completion hook)
  • Incident documentation (ADRs for root cause)
  • Operational runbooks in .specweave/docs/internal/operations/

Roles in Enterprise Development​

Enterprise applications require diverse expertise across multiple roles:

RoleResponsibilitiesSkillsSpecWeave Agent
Product Manager (PM)Define requirements, prioritize features, stakeholder communicationBusiness analysis, user research, roadmap planningPM Agent (spec)
Software ArchitectDesign system architecture, technology decisions, ADRsSystem design, scalability, trade-off analysisArchitect Agent (plan)
Backend DeveloperImplement APIs, business logic, database designJava, Python, Node.js, SQL, API designTech Lead Agent (tasks)
Frontend DeveloperBuild user interfaces, client-side logicReact, Angular, Vue, TypeScript, CSSFrontend Agent (plugin)
DevOps EngineerCI/CD pipelines, infrastructure, deployment automationDocker, Kubernetes, Terraform, AWS/AzureDevOps Agent (plugin)
QA EngineerTest planning, automation, quality assuranceSelenium, Playwright, test frameworksQA Agent (plugin)
Security EngineerSecurity audits, compliance, threat modelingOWASP, penetration testing, cryptographySecurity Agent (plugin)
Data EngineerData pipelines, ETL, analytics infrastructureSpark, Airflow, SQL, data modelingData Agent (plugin)
SRE (Site Reliability Engineer)Production reliability, incident response, monitoringLinux, networking, distributed systemsSRE Agent (plugin)

SpecWeave Connection

  • Core agents (PM, Architect, Tech Lead) mirror real-world roles
  • Plugin agents extend to specialized domains (ML, payments, infrastructure)
  • Agents produce artifacts in standard formats (spec.md, plan.md, tasks)

Common Enterprise Patterns​

1. API-First Development​

Concept: Design the API contract BEFORE implementing frontend or backend.

Benefits

  • Parallel development (frontend/backend teams)
  • Clear contract prevents integration issues
  • API documentation auto-generated

Example OpenAPI Spec

openapi: 3.0.0
paths:
/wishlist:
post:
summary: Add item to wishlist
requestBody:
content:
application/json:
schema:
type: object
properties:
productId:
type: string
responses:
201:
description: Item added
400:
description: Invalid product ID

2. Database-Per-Service (Microservices)​

Concept: Each microservice owns its database, no shared database.

Benefits

  • Services can evolve independently
  • Technology diversity (Postgres, MongoDB, Redis)
  • Fault isolation (payment DB down doesn't break user service)

Trade-offs

  • No SQL joins across services
  • Data consistency challenges (eventual consistency)
  • Distributed transactions complexity

3. Event-Driven Architecture​

Concept: Services communicate via events instead of direct API calls.

Benefits

  • Loose coupling (services don't know about each other)
  • Resilience (if inventory service is down, event waits in queue)
  • Scalability (add more consumers for popular events)

Use Cases

  • Order processing pipelines
  • Real-time notifications
  • Data synchronization
  • Audit logging

4. Circuit Breaker Pattern​

Concept: Prevent cascading failures when a service is down.

Benefits

  • Fast failure (don't wait for timeout)
  • Service recovery time (stops overwhelming broken service)
  • Graceful degradation (show cached data instead of error)

5. CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation)​

Concept: Separate read and write operations into different models.

Benefits

  • Optimized databases for each use case (write DB normalized, read DB denormalized)
  • Independent scaling (read-heavy apps scale read replicas)
  • Complex queries don't affect write performance

Use Cases

  • E-commerce product catalogs (millions of reads, few writes)
  • Analytics dashboards (complex queries)
  • Audit systems (append-only writes, complex reporting)

Documentation Strategy​

Why Documentation Matters​

Knowledge Sharing

  • New developers onboard faster (30 days β†’ 7 days with good docs)
  • Team alignment (everyone understands the "why")
  • Reduce bus factor (no single point of failure)

Future Maintenance

  • "Why did we choose Redis?" β†’ ADR explains the reasoning
  • "How does authentication work?" β†’ Architecture diagram shows flow
  • 6 months later: "What did this code do?" β†’ Inline comments help

Compliance Requirements

  • FDA (medical devices): Traceability from requirements to code
  • SOC 2 (security): Document access controls, incident response
  • HIPAA (healthcare): Audit trails for data access

Incident Response

  • Runbooks guide on-call engineers
  • Architecture diagrams help diagnose issues
  • Historical decisions (ADRs) provide context

Documentation Hierarchy​

SpecWeave's Living Documentation

Traditional problem: Docs become stale

Week 1: Write docs
Week 2: Update code, forget to update docs
Month 1: Docs are 50% wrong
Year 1: Docs are 90% wrong, no one trusts them

SpecWeave solution: Auto-sync after every task

Task completes β†’ post-task-completion hook fires β†’ living docs sync
- ADRs updated (Proposed β†’ Accepted)
- Architecture diagrams regenerated
- API docs refreshed
- Always current, always trusted

Real-World Example: E-Commerce Platform​

Let's build a complete e-commerce platform to see how enterprise concepts come together.

System Architecture​

User Checkout Flow (Detailed)​

Service Responsibilities​

User Service

  • Authentication (JWT tokens, OAuth2)
  • User profiles (name, email, preferences)
  • Address management (shipping, billing)
  • Password reset, email verification

Product Service

  • Product catalog (100K+ products)
  • Search (Elasticsearch for fast full-text search)
  • Reviews and ratings
  • Image storage (S3)

Cart Service

  • Shopping cart (Redis for fast access)
  • Wishlist
  • Cart expiration (7 days)
  • Session-based carts (guest users)

Order Service

  • Order creation, status tracking
  • Order history
  • Cancellation, returns
  • Integration with shipping service

Payment Service

  • Stripe, PayPal integration
  • PCI-DSS compliance (never store card numbers)
  • Refund processing
  • Transaction history

Inventory Service

  • Stock levels (real-time)
  • Warehouse management
  • Restock alerts
  • Stock reservation (during checkout)

Notification Service

  • Email (SendGrid, Mailgun)
  • SMS (Twilio)
  • Push notifications (Firebase)
  • Templates (order confirmation, shipping updates)

Shipping Service

  • Carrier integration (FedEx, UPS, USPS)
  • Tracking number generation
  • Shipping cost calculation
  • Delivery time estimates

Data Models (Simplified)​

User Service

CREATE TABLE users (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
email VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
password_hash VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
first_name VARCHAR(100),
last_name VARCHAR(100),
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
);

CREATE TABLE addresses (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
user_id UUID REFERENCES users(id),
street VARCHAR(255),
city VARCHAR(100),
state VARCHAR(50),
zip_code VARCHAR(20),
country VARCHAR(50),
is_default BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE
);

Order Service

CREATE TABLE orders (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
user_id UUID NOT NULL,
status VARCHAR(50), -- PENDING, PAID, SHIPPED, DELIVERED, CANCELLED
total_amount DECIMAL(10,2),
shipping_address_id UUID,
payment_method VARCHAR(50),
payment_transaction_id VARCHAR(255),
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW(),
updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
);

CREATE TABLE order_items (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
order_id UUID REFERENCES orders(id),
product_id UUID,
quantity INT,
unit_price DECIMAL(10,2),
subtotal DECIMAL(10,2)
);

API Endpoints (Sample)​

# User Service
POST /auth/signup
POST /auth/login
POST /auth/logout
GET /users/:id
PUT /users/:id
GET /users/:id/addresses
POST /users/:id/addresses

# Product Service
GET /products
GET /products/:id
POST /products (admin only)
GET /products/search?q=laptop
POST /products/:id/reviews

# Cart Service
GET /cart
POST /cart/items
DELETE /cart/items/:id
POST /cart/clear

# Order Service
POST /orders
GET /orders/:id
GET /orders (user's order history)
PUT /orders/:id/cancel

# Payment Service
POST /payments (internal only, called by order service)
POST /refunds (admin only)

Development Workflow with SpecWeave​

Phase 1: Planning

# PM creates increment
/specweave:increment "Add wishlist feature"

# Generates spec.md with:
# - User stories (US-001: Save items to wishlist)
# - Acceptance criteria (AC-US1-01: User can add/remove items)
# - Success metrics (wishlist adoption rate > 30%)

Phase 2: Design

# Architect reviews spec, creates plan.md with:
# - HLD: Wishlist table in Cart Service
# - API design: POST /wishlist, GET /wishlist, DELETE /wishlist/:id
# - Database schema
# - ADR: Why Cart Service owns wishlist (not User Service)

Phase 3: Implementation

# Tech Lead generates tasks.md with embedded tests:
# - T-001: Create Wishlist table (unit tests, 90% coverage)
# - T-002: Add POST /wishlist endpoint (integration tests, 85% coverage)
# - T-003: Add GET /wishlist endpoint (E2E tests, critical path)
# - T-004: Update frontend (Playwright tests)
# - T-005: Documentation update

# Execute tasks
/specweave:do

# Claude Code implements T-001, T-002, etc.
# After each task: post-task-completion hook syncs living docs

Phase 4: Testing

# Validate test coverage
/specweave:validate-coverage

# Output:
# βœ… T-001: 92% coverage (target: 90%)
# βœ… T-002: 87% coverage (target: 85%)
# βœ… T-003: 100% E2E critical path
# βœ… T-004: Playwright tests passing
# βœ… Overall: 89% coverage (target: 85%)

Phase 5: Deployment

# CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions)
# - Build β†’ Unit tests β†’ Integration tests β†’ Deploy to staging
# - E2E tests on staging β†’ Manual approval β†’ Deploy to production
# - Post-deployment: Living docs sync, DORA metrics update

Phase 6: Operations

# Monitoring dashboard shows:
# - Wishlist creation rate: 1,200/hour
# - API latency: P95 = 120ms (target: <200ms)
# - Error rate: 0.3% (target: <1%)

# Living docs automatically updated:
# - ADR-012: Wishlist in Cart Service (Proposed β†’ Accepted)
# - API docs: POST /wishlist endpoint documented
# - Architecture diagram: Wishlist component added

How SpecWeave Supports Enterprise Development​

1. Specification-First Workflow​

Traditional Problem

Developer: "I'll just start coding, we can figure out requirements later"
Result: Scope creep, rework, missed requirements

SpecWeave Solution

PM Agent: Generate spec.md with:
- User stories (what the user wants)
- Acceptance criteria (measurable done conditions)
- Success metrics (how we measure impact)

Result: Clear direction, no ambiguity, testable outcomes

Benefits

  • Single source of truth (spec)
  • Traceability (requirement β†’ code β†’ test)
  • Stakeholder alignment (everyone approves spec first)

2. Architecture Documentation (ADRs)​

Traditional Problem

6 months later: "Why did we choose MongoDB?"
Engineer: "I don't remember. The person who decided left the company."
Result: Fear of change, technical debt accumulates

SpecWeave Solution

Architect Agent: Generate ADR-005
- Context: Need database for product catalog
- Decision: Elasticsearch (not MongoDB)
- Rationale: Fast full-text search, faceted navigation
- Alternatives: MongoDB (slower search), PostgreSQL (no full-text)
- Status: Accepted

Result: Historical record, rationale preserved forever

Benefits

  • Onboarding (new engineers understand past decisions)
  • Change decisions (re-evaluate with full context)
  • Compliance (audit trail for regulations)

3. Test Traceability (AC-IDs)​

Traditional Problem

QA: "This test is failing. What requirement does it test?"
Engineer: "I don't know. The test was written 2 years ago."
Result: Fear of deleting tests, bloated test suites

SpecWeave Solution

spec.md:
AC-US1-01: User can add items to wishlist

tasks.md:
T-002: Implement POST /wishlist endpoint
AC: AC-US1-01
Test Cases:
- Unit: addToWishlist(userId, productId) β†’ wishlist updated
- Integration: POST /wishlist β†’ 201 Created
- E2E: User clicks "Add to Wishlist" β†’ item appears in wishlist page

Result: Clear traceability from requirement to test

Benefits

  • Understand test purpose (AC-US1-01 explains why this test exists)
  • Safe refactoring (if requirement changes, update linked tests)
  • Coverage analysis (/specweave:validate-coverage shows AC-ID coverage)

4. Living Documentation (Auto-Sync)​

Traditional Problem

Week 1: Write docs (accurate)
Week 2: Update code, forget docs (docs 20% stale)
Month 1: Docs 50% wrong
Year 1: Docs 90% wrong, no one trusts them

SpecWeave Solution

post-task-completion.sh hook:
- Task T-002 completes
- Hook fires automatically
- Syncs living docs:
- ADR-012: Proposed β†’ Accepted
- API docs: POST /wishlist endpoint added
- Architecture diagram: Wishlist component added
- CHANGELOG.md: Updated with new feature

Result: Docs always current, always trusted

Benefits

  • Zero manual effort (automation)
  • Always accurate (syncs after every task)
  • Trusted source (team relies on docs)

5. Compliance Support (FDA, SOC 2, HIPAA)​

Regulatory Requirements

FDA (Medical Devices)

  • Traceability: Requirement β†’ Design β†’ Code β†’ Test
  • Validation: Tests prove requirements are met
  • Change control: Document all changes

SOC 2 (Security)

  • Access controls: Who can deploy to production?
  • Audit trails: When was code deployed? By whom?
  • Incident response: Documented runbooks

HIPAA (Healthcare)

  • Data handling: Encrypt PHI (Protected Health Information)
  • Access logs: Who accessed patient data?
  • Compliance documentation: Policies, procedures

SpecWeave Compliance Features

AC-IDs provide traceability:
SPEC-0005 (User Authentication)
β”œβ”€β”€ AC-US1-01: User can log in
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ T-001: Implement AuthService
β”‚ β”‚ └── Test: validLogin() passes
β”‚ └── T-003: Implement POST /auth/login
β”‚ └── Test: E2E login flow passes
└── AC-US1-02: Failed login attempts are logged
└── T-004: Implement audit logging
└── Test: Failed login creates audit log entry

Audit trail:
2025-11-04 10:30 - PM Agent creates spec.md
2025-11-04 11:15 - Architect Agent creates plan.md
2025-11-04 14:20 - T-001 completed (commit abc123)
2025-11-04 16:45 - T-003 completed (commit def456)
2025-11-05 09:10 - Deployed to production (v1.2.0)

ADRs document decisions:
ADR-007: Why We Chose JWT for Authentication
- Regulatory context: HIPAA requires secure authentication
- Decision: JWT tokens (not session cookies)
- Rationale: Stateless, scalable, audit trail in token

Best Practices for Enterprise Development​

1. Start Small, Iterate Often​

Don't: Build the entire system before deploying

6 months development β†’ Deploy β†’ Realize requirements changed

Do: Ship incremental value

Week 1: Basic authentication β†’ Deploy
Week 2: User profiles β†’ Deploy
Week 3: Password reset β†’ Deploy

SpecWeave Support: Increments naturally enforce small batches

2. Write Tests First (TDD)​

Don't: Write code, then write tests as an afterthought

Code works β†’ Tests pass (but are they testing the right thing?)

Do: Write tests first

Red (failing test) β†’ Green (minimal code) β†’ Refactor (improve code)

SpecWeave Support: test_mode: TDD in tasks.md, embedded test plans

3. Document Decisions (ADRs)​

Don't: Make decisions in Slack/email, no record

6 months later: "Why did we choose X?"
Answer: "No one remembers"

Do: Write Architecture Decision Records

ADR-008: Why We Chose Polling Over WebSockets
- Context: Need real-time order updates
- Decision: Long-polling (not WebSockets)
- Rationale: Simpler, works with load balancers, fewer browser issues

SpecWeave Support: ADRs auto-generated, stored in .specweave/docs/internal/architecture/adr/

4. Code Reviews Are Mandatory​

Don't: Merge code without review

Developer pushes to main β†’ Production breaks

Do: Pull Request workflow

Feature branch β†’ PR β†’ Code review β†’ Approval β†’ Merge

Best Practices

  • Small PRs (200-400 lines, easier to review)
  • Clear description (what, why, testing done)
  • Link to spec (AC-IDs)

5. Monitor Everything​

Don't: Deploy and hope it works

Production breaks β†’ Users complain β†’ You find out hours later

Do: Proactive monitoring

Error rate spike β†’ Alert fires β†’ On-call investigates β†’ Fix deployed

Four Golden Signals (Google SRE)

  • Latency: How long requests take
  • Traffic: How many requests
  • Errors: How many requests fail
  • Saturation: How full the system is (CPU, memory)

6. Automate Repetitive Tasks​

Don't: Manual processes (error-prone, slow)

Developer: "Can someone deploy to staging?"
DevOps: "I'm busy, maybe tomorrow"

Do: CI/CD automation

Push to main β†’ Tests run β†’ Deploy to staging (automatic)
Manual approval β†’ Deploy to production (one-click)

7. Use Feature Flags​

Don't: Big bang releases (all-or-nothing)

Deploy new checkout flow β†’ 20% of users can't checkout β†’ Rollback

Do: Feature flags (gradual rollout)

Enable for 5% β†’ Monitor β†’ 50% β†’ Monitor β†’ 100%

Example

if (featureFlags.newCheckoutFlow) {
// New code
} else {
// Old code (fallback)
}

8. Practice Blameless Postmortems​

Don't: Blame individuals for incidents

"Who broke production?" β†’ Fear, hiding mistakes

Do: Blameless postmortems (focus on systems)

"What systemic issue allowed this to happen?"
"How can we prevent this class of error?"

Example Postmortem

Incident: Database ran out of disk space
Root Cause: No disk usage monitoring
Fix: Add disk usage alerts (>80% β†’ warning, >90% β†’ critical)
Prevention: Automated disk cleanup scripts
Follow-up: Review all critical resources for monitoring gaps

9. Keep Services Small and Focused​

Don't: Monolithic microservices (1000+ endpoints in one service)

"User Service" that also handles orders, payments, shipping

Do: Single Responsibility Principle

User Service: Authentication, profiles
Order Service: Order management
Payment Service: Payment processing

Rule of thumb: If it takes >30 minutes to explain a service, it's too big

10. Invest in Developer Experience​

Don't: "Works on my machine" problems

New developer: "I spent 3 days setting up the environment"

Do: One-command setup

make dev-setup  # Installs all dependencies, seeds database, starts services

SpecWeave Support: specweave init sets up project structure, .claude/ files, ready to go

Common Pitfalls to Avoid​

1. Premature Optimization​

Mistake: Optimize before knowing if it's needed

Developer: "Let's cache everything! Add Redis! Use microservices!"
Result: Complexity without benefit (100 users don't need microservices)

Solution: Measure first, optimize later

Profile the code β†’ Find bottleneck β†’ Optimize that ONE thing

Rule: "Premature optimization is the root of all evil" - Donald Knuth

2. Skipping Tests​

Mistake: "We'll add tests later" (spoiler: you won't)

No tests β†’ Code breaks β†’ Fear of change β†’ Technical debt

Solution: Tests are non-negotiable

SpecWeave: tasks.md includes test plans (80-90% coverage)
CI/CD: Blocks merges if tests fail

3. Not Planning for Failure​

Mistake: Assume everything works perfectly

Payment gateway goes down β†’ Entire checkout flow breaks

Solution: Design for failure

Circuit breakers (fail fast)
Fallbacks (use cached data)
Graceful degradation (show error message, allow retry)

4. Poor Error Messages​

Mistake: Generic error messages

User sees: "Error 500: Internal Server Error"
Developer sees: Stack trace with no context

Solution: Actionable error messages

User sees: "Payment declined. Please check your card details or try another card."
Developer sees: "PaymentGatewayError: Stripe API returned 402 (insufficient_funds)"
Logs include: request ID, user ID, timestamp, stack trace

5. No Rollback Plan​

Mistake: Deploy without a way to undo

Deploy v2.0 β†’ Production breaks β†’ "How do we rollback?"

Solution: Always have a rollback plan

Blue-green deployment (instant rollback by switching traffic)
Database migrations (reversible with down() function)
Feature flags (disable feature without redeploying)

6. Ignoring Security​

Mistake: "We'll add security later"

Launch with no HTTPS β†’ User passwords stolen β†’ Lawsuit

Solution: Security from day one

HTTPS everywhere (TLS certificates)
Input validation (prevent SQL injection, XSS)
Authentication (JWT tokens, not session cookies)
Regular security audits (penetration testing)

7. Over-Engineering​

Mistake: Use complex architecture for simple problems

TODO list app with microservices, Kafka, Kubernetes

Solution: Choose the right tool for the job

Small app: Monolith (Rails, Django)
Medium app: Modular monolith (separate modules, one codebase)
Large app: Microservices (when team size >50 engineers)

Rule: Start simple, split when needed (not preemptively)

Next Steps: Continue Your Learning​

Infrastructure & Operations

  • Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Fundamentals
    • Terraform, CloudFormation, Ansible
    • Immutable infrastructure
    • GitOps workflows

Backend Development

  • Backend Development Guide
    • REST APIs, GraphQL
    • Database design (SQL vs NoSQL)
    • Authentication patterns

Frontend Development

  • Frontend Development Guide
    • React, Angular, Vue
    • State management (Redux, Zustand)
    • Performance optimization

DevOps & CI/CD

  • CI/CD Pipeline Design
    • GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins
    • Automated testing strategies
    • Deployment strategies

Testing Strategies

  • Testing Pyramid in Practice
    • Unit, integration, E2E tests
    • TDD and BDD workflows
    • Test coverage strategies

Glossary Terms​

Deepen your understanding of key concepts:

SpecWeave in Action​

Try SpecWeave for Your Next Project

  1. Install SpecWeave

    npm install -g specweave
    specweave init
  2. Create Your First Increment

    /specweave:increment "Add user authentication"
  3. Follow the Workflow

    • PM agent generates spec.md (user stories, AC)
    • Architect agent creates plan.md (HLD, LLD, ADRs)
    • Tech Lead generates tasks.md (embedded tests)
    • /specweave:do executes tasks
    • Living docs sync automatically
  4. Join the Community

Additional Resources​

Books

  • Designing Data-Intensive Applications by Martin Kleppmann
  • The Phoenix Project by Gene Kim (DevOps)
  • Clean Architecture by Robert C. Martin
  • Site Reliability Engineering by Google

Courses

Blogs & Newsletters


Summary​

Enterprise application development is fundamentally different from building personal projects. It requires:

Planning & Discipline

  • Specification-first workflows (clear requirements)
  • Architecture decisions documented (ADRs)
  • Test-driven development (80%+ coverage)

Scale & Reliability

  • Microservices for independent scaling
  • Database-per-service for fault isolation
  • Event-driven architecture for resilience
  • Circuit breakers for graceful degradation

Team Collaboration

  • Clear roles (PM, Architect, Developers, DevOps)
  • Living documentation (always current)
  • Code reviews (peer validation)
  • Blameless postmortems (learn from failures)

Automation & Monitoring

  • CI/CD pipelines (automated testing and deployment)
  • Observability (logging, metrics, alerting)
  • Infrastructure as Code (reproducible deployments)

SpecWeave Advantage

  • Specification-first (spec.md = single source of truth)
  • Living documentation (auto-syncs after every task)
  • Test traceability (AC-IDs link requirements to tests)
  • Compliance support (FDA, SOC 2, HIPAA)
  • Increment-based workflow (small batches, continuous delivery)

Next Steps: Start your next project with SpecWeave, follow the SDLC, and build enterprise-grade systems with confidence.


Document Version: 1.0 Last Updated: 2025-11-04 Feedback: Open an issue or join discussions